Can a Will Be Contested? Grounds and Procedures Explained

Wills serve as legally binding documents that outline how a person’s assets should be distributed after their passing. While most are executed smoothly, disputes can arise when heirs or beneficiaries believe something is amiss.
Will contests aren’t uncommon, especially when significant assets are involved or family tensions exist. Specific legal grounds must be met to challenge a will successfully.
At Porter Law Firm, located in Mount Pleasant, Charleston, Summerville, and Hilton Head, South Carolina, we help clients understand their rights when contesting a will or defending its validity. Read on to learn about the reasons wills may be contested and the legal process involved.
Not just anyone can challenge a will—only those with a direct interest in the estate have the right to contest it. Even then, the challenge must be based on legally recognized grounds rather than personal dissatisfaction with asset distribution.
One common reason for contesting a will is lack of testamentary capacity, meaning the person who created the document wasn’t of sound mind. Undue influence, fraud, and improper execution are also valid legal reasons to challenge a will. When any of these issues arise, the court must determine if the will reflects the true intentions of the deceased.
For a will to be legally valid, the testator must have been mentally competent when creating it. This means they understood the nature of their estate, who their heirs were, and the effect of their decisions.
If a person is suffering from advanced dementia, severe illness, or cognitive impairment, their ability to make sound decisions may be questioned. Medical records, witness testimony, and expert evaluations often play a crucial role in proving a lack of testamentary capacity in court. If proven, the will may be deemed invalid, leading to further legal proceedings.
In some cases, a will may be contested due to undue influence, where someone exerts excessive pressure on the testator to alter their wishes. This often occurs when a vulnerable individual is manipulated by a caregiver, relative, or advisor for personal gain.
Signs of undue influence include sudden changes to beneficiaries, exclusion of close family members, or the presence of one individual during the will’s creation.
Courts will examine evidence such as financial transactions, witness statements, and the testator’s vulnerability to determine if coercion played a role in the will’s execution. If undue influence is proven, the will may be set aside.
Wills must accurately reflect the testator’s true intentions, free from fraud or misrepresentation. Unfortunately, fraudulent actions can sometimes occur, leading to disputes among beneficiaries.
Some key factors to keep in mind include:
False representations: If someone deceived the testator into signing a will under false pretenses, the document could be invalid.
Forgery concerns: Altered signatures or fabricated documents can lead to a will being challenged in court.
Misleading statements: If a person misrepresents facts to the testator, causing them to make changes against their true wishes, it may constitute fraud.
Unfamiliar changes: Drastic alterations to a will without clear explanation or prior discussion may indicate fraudulent influence.
When fraud is suspected, forensic analysis and witness testimony become critical in determining the will’s authenticity. If proven, the fraudulent portions or the entire will may be thrown out by the court.
State laws outline specific requirements for executing wills, including the number of witnesses, signature placement, and notarization in some cases. If a will doesn’t meet these legal formalities, it may be deemed invalid.
For example, if the will lacks the required witnesses or was signed incorrectly, the court may refuse to recognize it. Handwritten wills, known as holographic wills, may also be subject to stricter scrutiny depending on state laws. Assuring proper execution from the outset can help prevent these types of legal challenges.
Only individuals with legal standing can initiate a will contest, meaning they must have a direct financial interest in the estate. Not everyone who is unhappy with an inheritance outcome can file a challenge.
Some key factors to keep in mind include:
Heirs-at-law: Immediate family members, such as spouses, children, or siblings, may challenge a will if they were excluded.
Named beneficiaries: Those listed in a prior version of the will may have grounds to contest a sudden change in distributions.
Creditors of the estate: In some cases, individuals or entities owed money by the deceased may have a legal interest in the estate’s distribution.
Personal representatives: Executors or trustees may contest a will if they believe it conflicts with legal obligations or prior agreements.
Understanding who has the right to contest a will is an essential first step before proceeding with legal action. Once standing is established, the formal contesting process begins.
Challenging a will involves a formal legal process that varies by state but generally follows key steps. It begins with filing a petition in probate court, outlining the legal grounds for the contest.
The next phase includes gathering evidence, such as medical records, witness testimony, and financial documents, to support the claim. During this time, both sides may engage in negotiations or mediation to resolve the dispute outside of court.
If no settlement is reached, the case proceeds to a trial, where a judge or jury determines the outcome. The entire process can take months or even years, depending on the intricacy of the case.
Once a will contest is initiated, several possible outcomes may arise depending on the court’s ruling. If the challenge is successful, the court may declare the entire will invalid, revert to a prior version, or distribute assets according to state intestacy laws.
If the contest is unsuccessful, the will remains in effect, and assets are distributed as outlined. In some cases, partial invalidation occurs, where only specific provisions are struck down while the rest of the document remains intact. These outcomes depend on the evidence presented and the specific legal grounds cited in the challenge.
Rather than pursuing a lengthy court battle, many families turn to mediation to resolve will disputes. Mediation offers a structured environment where all parties can discuss their concerns with the guidance of a neutral third party.
This process can lead to a more amicable resolution, helping families avoid the emotional and financial strain of a trial. Mediation also provides an opportunity for creative solutions, allowing beneficiaries to negotiate terms that may better suit their needs.
For those looking to preserve family relationships while settling disagreements, mediation can be a valuable alternative to litigation.
Some wills include no-contest clauses, which discourage challenges by threatening to disinherit anyone who contests the document. These clauses can be effective in preventing frivolous disputes but may not always hold up in court.
If a person has legitimate legal grounds for contesting a will, a no-contest clause may not be enforced. Courts generally evaluate whether the challenge is being made in good faith before deciding how to apply these provisions. Understanding how no-contest clauses work can help beneficiaries determine whether challenging a will is a risk worth taking.
Will contests can be complicated, but understanding the legal grounds and procedures can help individuals protect their rights. At our firm, Attorney Porter guides clients through will disputes throughout South Carolina, whether contesting a will or defending its validity.
Contact Porter Law Firm today to discuss your estate planning concerns and confirm your final wishes will be upheld.